Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/25/2004

State v. Carter

Citations

91 P.3d 1162
278 Kan. 74
2004 Kan. LEXIS 417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a statement by a prosecutor on a fact not in evidence constitutes misconduct
holding a challenge to the Confrontation Clause is reviewed de novo when the facts are undisputed
depending on the contours of the rule in question, evidentiary rules governing admission and exclusion may be applied either as a matter of law or in the exercise of the district judge’s discretion
when the underlying facts are undisputed, this court’s review of whether a Confrontation Clause issue arose is de novo
\'No rule governing oral argument is more fundamental than that requiring counsel to confine remarks to matters in evidence.'\
extrinsic evidence of witness' prior contradictory statements was admissible \as long as [the witness] was given an opportunity to explain\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.