State v. Ly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prosecutor’s misstatement of fact in the closing argument was not gross and flagrant because it was an insignificant part of the State’s case
• holding that the prosecutor’s misstatement of fact in the closing argument was not gross and flagrant because it was an insignificant part of the State’s case
• stating Anthony five-factor test only applies when defendant requests a continuance so he could retain new counsel
• statement made in closing argument not supported by evidence at trial; court proceeded to second step in prosecutorial misconduct analysis: whether statement constituted plain error
• statement made in closing argument not supported by evidence at trial; court proceeded to second step in prosecutorial misconduct analysis: whether statement constituted plain error
• failure to intercede in events culminating in homicide supports guilt on aiding, abetting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).