Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/19/2009

State v. Dixon

Citations

209 P.3d 675
289 Kan. 46
2009 Kan. LEXIS 176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that although the use of PIK instructions is not mandatory, it is strongly recommended
applying the above standards of review to an evidentiary issue involving non-K.S.A. 60-455 evidence
applying the above standards of review to an evidentiary issue involving non-K.S.A. 60-455 evidence
appellate review of denial of mistrial should consider whether tire evidence improperly admitted would affect the outcome of the trial
court’s independent inquiry of jurors confirming im partiality cured potential due process concerns after juror observed defendant in leg shackles
court's independent inquiry of jurors confirming impartiality cured potential due process concerns after juror observed defendant in leg shackles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier, Davis, Nuss, Luckert, Greene, Hill, Leben

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.