Supreme Court of Kansas· 2/3/2006

State v. Ross

Citations

280 Kan. 878
127 P.3d 249
2006 Kan. LEXIS 8

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that limiting instruction cured prejudicial effect of admitting evidence that defendant and one of defendant’s witnesses were members of the same gang
concluding that a limiting instruction cured the prejudicial effect of admitting evidence that the defendant and one of defendant’s witnesses were members of the same gang
stating that gang affiliation evidence is admissible “to establish a motive for an otherwise inexplicable act”
Proof of bias is almost always relevant to the finder of fact and weigher of credibility.
Kansas caselaw permits the admission of such evidence without restriction.
proof defendant knew he was being sought not required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.