Griffin v. Suzuki Motor Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that whether statute excluded certain evidence was question of law and that district court did not have discretion to admit evidence if statute prohibited admission
• finding that the phrase \change in design\ encompassed a \'wholly different design'\
• \Intent of the legislature is to be derived in the first place from the words used.\
• under facts of the case, admissibility of evidence involved a question of law and allowed unlimited review
• “ ‘A district court by definition abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law.’ ”
• whether admission of evidence violated provision of Kansas Products Liability Act reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).