· 4/21/2000
State v. Moncla
Citations
- 4 P.3d 618
- 269 Kan. 61
- 2000 Kan. LEXIS 353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the \fundamental problem\ with a district court's failure to follow Rule 183 [j] is that it \impedes appellate review\
- noting that \the fundamental problem with [the lack of findings of fact and conclusions of law] is that it impedes appellate review\
- noting difficulty of reviewing case in which district court failed to state findings, conclusions
- noting difficulty of reviewing case in which district court failed to state findings, conclusions
- noting difficulty of reviewing case in which district court failed to state findings, conclusions
- district court did not comply with Rule 183(j) and case remanded for findings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Six
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.