Skip to main content
· 4/21/2000

State v. Moncla

Citations

  • 4 P.3d 618
  • 269 Kan. 61
  • 2000 Kan. LEXIS 353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the \fundamental problem\ with a district court's failure to follow Rule 183 [j] is that it \impedes appellate review\
  • noting that \the fundamental problem with [the lack of findings of fact and conclusions of law] is that it impedes appellate review\
  • noting difficulty of reviewing case in which district court failed to state findings, conclusions
  • noting difficulty of reviewing case in which district court failed to state findings, conclusions
  • noting difficulty of reviewing case in which district court failed to state findings, conclusions
  • district court did not comply with Rule 183(j) and case remanded for findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Six

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.