United States v. John Arthur Daniels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that hybrid representation, partly pro se and partly counseled, is not allowed
• explaining “hybrid representation” as representation “partly by counsel and partly by [defendant]”
• “It is questionable whether a trial court should base evidentiary decisions on a prosecutor’s unsubstantiated representations.”
• “It is questionable whether a trial court should base evidentiary decisions on a prosecutor’s unsubstantiated representations.”
• court held that testimony about information in sheriff department’s anonymous informant’s investigative report to the effect that defendant was heroin trafficker was admissible even though witness’ testimony constituted double level hearsay as to the two reports
• criticizing the Fifth Circuit’s position

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).