Connecticut Appellate Court· 8/8/1989
State v. Baxter
Citations
- 19 Conn. App. 304
- 563 A.2d 721
- 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 259
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that probation may be revoked even if the failure to obey a condition of probation is not found to be intentional or willful
- upholding trial court’s judgment revoking probation that was based on implicit finding that beneficial purposes of probation no longer being served even though court did not make specific findings
- minimum due process requirements for probation revocation proceedings “include . . . the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, [and] the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dupont
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-09· cited 81×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-06-12· cited 33×
- State v. PattersonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-04-22· cited 31×
- State v. GauthierConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-12-03· cited 25×
- State v. DavisConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-01-05· cited 23×
- State v. ScottConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-06-22· cited 23×
- State v. MarchConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-09-12· cited 22×
- State v. SHAKIRConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-08-02· cited 15×
- State v. CareyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-02-16· cited 15×
- State v. StricklandConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-09-03· cited 15×
- State v. HobsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-02-05· cited 15×
- State v. PolancoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2016-05-17· cited 13×
- State v. BostwickConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-04-06· cited 13×
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. CampbellSupreme Court of Missouri· 1995-09-19· cited 11×
- State v. DeMasiConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-04-05· cited 11×
- State v. VerdoliniConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-04-29· cited 9×
- State v. SoltesConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-12-12· cited 8×
- State v. RyersonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1990-01-30· cited 8×
- State v. VillanoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-12-07· cited 6×
- State v. PrestonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-01-31· cited 6×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 2,149×
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1983-05-24· cited 1,941×
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court· 1976-11-15· cited 1,394×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-05· cited 917×
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 620×
- Wood v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court· 1976-03-22· cited 132×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-19· cited 128×
- State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-07-02· cited 117×
- Payne v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-05-24· cited 103×
- Lee v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-06-03· cited 102×
- State v. ThurmanConnecticut Appellate Court· 1987-03-31· cited 96×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-07-29· cited 82×
- United States v. Ross Joseph StradaEighth Circuit· 1974-10-10· cited 79×
- Plyler v. EvattSupreme Court· 1988-10-11· cited 75×
- State v. RobersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-05· cited 74×
- Liistro v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-01-27· cited 56×
- Freccia v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-05-24· cited 44×
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-06-14· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.