Connecticut Appellate Court· 4/22/1993
State v. Patterson
Citations
- 31 Conn. App. 278
- 624 A.2d 1146
- 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 225
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where trial court proceeded to revoke probation at conclusion of trial and conviction on another offense, lack of written notice of revocation required reversal
- On appeal, court found defendant had waived right to trial judge’s presence during voir dire of prospective jurors, but held trial judge’s presence cannot be waived by either party in future cases
- On appeal, court found defendant had waived right to trial judge's presence during voir dire of prospective jurors, but held trial judge's presence cannot be waived by either party in future cases
- police observed defendant as he exited vehicle to approach them
- defendant seen placing drugs into car
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 102×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-04-02· cited 91×
- State v. CatorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-07-17· cited 63×
- State v. CalderonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-12-08· cited 61×
- People v. SalyerColorado Court of Appeals· 2003-02-13· cited 45×
- Coddington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2011-05-13· cited 38×
- State v. BradleyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-08-29· cited 31×
- State v. GreenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-03-06· cited 27×
- Bennett v. Automobile InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-08-24· cited 17×
- State v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-09-15· cited 13×
- State v. PattersonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-05-16· cited 10×
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-12-17· cited 9×
- State v. ArtisConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-07-10· cited 9×
- State v. LopezConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-04-11· cited 8×
- Shaw v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2000-03-09· cited 7×
- State v. CollinsConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-06-20· cited 7×
- State v. GrahamConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-01-10· cited 5×
- State v. CoxConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-12-27· cited 4×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-07-15· cited 2×
- State v. LopezConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-06-21· cited 2×
Cites
135 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 3,189×
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 2,917×
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court· 1927-03-14· cited 2,714×
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 2,651×
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 2,431×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 2,166×
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 1,999×
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1879-01-18· cited 1,827×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.