Supreme Court· 10/11/1988
Plyler v. Evatt
Citations
- 488 U.S. 897
- 109 S. Ct. 241
- 57 U.S.L.W. 3260
- 102 L. Ed. 2d 230
- 1988 U.S. LEXIS 4289
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rational basis for admission of evidence otherwise subject to exclusionary rule exists . . .
- rational basis for admission of evidence otherwise subject to exclusionary rule exists, because “the state has a legitimate interest in accurate factfinding in probation revocation proceedings” [emphasis added]
- despite “a strict standard for modification of consent decrees between private parties, this standard is inappropriate in institutional reform litigation for ‘the unique nature and demands of institutional reform litigation necessitate a more flexible approach to modification’ ”
- criminal conviction more than enough to revoke probation
- inapplicability of the exclusionary rule
- inapplicability of the exclusionary rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-04-23· cited 231×
- Summerville v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-05-24· cited 148×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-21· cited 123×
- Plyler v. MooreFourth Circuit· 1996-11-14· cited 92×
- State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-09· cited 81×
- Iovieno v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-26· cited 71×
- Small v. HuntFourth Circuit· 1996-10-16· cited 67×
- State v. CatorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-07-17· cited 63×
- Taylor v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-11-20· cited 57×
- Fishbein v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-22· cited 52×
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-03-16· cited 44×
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-08· cited 37×
- State v. BaxterConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-08-08· cited 36×
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-07-10· cited 28×
- State v. HooksConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-10-28· cited 25×
- State v. DurantConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-03-14· cited 25×
- Heath v. De CourcySixth Circuit· 1989-11-03· cited 24×
- State v. DavisConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-01-05· cited 23×
- State v. ScottConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-06-22· cited 23×
- State v. RollinsConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-01-12· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.