Supreme Court of Connecticut· 4/19/1988

State v. Smith

Citations

207 Conn. 152
540 A.2d 679
87 A.L.R. 4th 901
1988 Conn. LEXIS 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

discussing whether removal of revocation of probation from defendant’s criminal record is direct or collateral consequence for purposes of determining mootness of appeal
“[a] defendant who seeks to reverse the exercise of judicial discretion, assumes a heavy burden”
[a] defendant who seeks to reverse the exercise of judicial discretion, assumes a heavy burden
‘[a] defendant who seeks to reverse the exercise of judicial discretion, assumes a heavy burden’
‘[a] defendant who seeks to reverse the exercise of judicial discretion, assumes a heavy burden’
[a] defendant who seeks to reverse the exercise of judicial discretion, assumes a heavy burden

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Healey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

103 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

100 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.