Skip to main content

State v. White

Citations

  • 169 Conn. 223
  • 363 A.2d 143
  • 1975 Conn. LEXIS 816

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that statute stating court “shall” deliver written copy of probation conditions to defendant was directory because it did not provide penalty, and enforcing condition against defendant who had actual notice of condition
  • concluding that statute stating court “shall” deliver written copy of probation conditions to defendant was directory because it did not provide penalty, and enforcing condition against defendant who had actual notice of condition
  • “Sentencing should not be a game in which a wrong move by a judge means immunity for the prisoner.”
  • “Sentencing should not be a game in which a wrong move by a judge means immunity for the prisoner.”
  • drug counselor’s testimony based on personal observation admissible although records of the defendant’s treatment were privileged under federal statutes
  • observations of person undergoing drug treatment, even if put on paper, are not elevated to status of confidential record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: House, Cotter, Loiselle, Longo, Speziale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.