Nebraska Supreme Court· 1/6/2017

State v. Baxter

Citations

295 Neb. 496
888 N.W.2d 726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that decision whether to grant continuance in criminal case is within discretion of trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal absent abuse of discretion
finding no prejudice in denial of continuance so that defendant could obtain drug and alcohol evaluation where presentence investigation report included ample information about defendant’s substance abuse issues
where criminal defendant’s motion for continuance is based upon occurrence or nonoccurrence of events within defendant’s own control, denial of such motion is no abuse of discretion
determination of whether substantial and compelling reasons exist to deny probation under § 29-2204.02(2)(c) is within the trial court’s discretion and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion
determination of whether substantial and compelling reasons exist to deny probation under § 29-2204.02(2)(c) is within the trial court’s discretion and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Baxter

58 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.