Skip to main content

State v. Carey

Citations

  • 222 Conn. 299
  • 610 A.2d 1147
  • 1992 Conn. LEXIS 183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “Practice Book rules do not ordinarily define subject matter jurisdiction” and that “[t]he defendant . . . waived his right to contest the defective procedure [under the rules of practice] by failing to object [in the trial court]”
  • \[t]he Superior Court hearing a criminal matter acquires subject matter jurisdiction from its authority as a constitutional court of unlimited jurisdiction\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • “the subject matter jurisdiction over a probation revocation proceeding derives from the original presentment of the information”
  • court may raise issue of subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte because it “involves the authority of a court to adjudicate the type of controversy presented by the action before it”
  • “[j]urisdiction involves the power in a court to hear and determine the cause of action presented to it and its source is the constitutional and statutory provisions by which it is created” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • rules of practice do not ordinarily define subject matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.