State v. Preston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[m]ootness implicates the court’s subject matter jurisdiction and is therefore a threshold issue for us to resolve” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Preston
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-08· cited 54×
• State v. Wright
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-03-11· cited 3×
• State v. Preston
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-10-14· cited 2×
• State v. Preston
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-04-07· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Faraday
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-03-16· cited 119×
• State v. McElveen
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-08-06· cited 84×
• Ayala v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-02-20· cited 57×
• State v. Singleton
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-07-12· cited 47×
• Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Rocque
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-12-23· cited 41×
• State v. Baxter
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1989-08-08· cited 36×
• State v. Jones
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-11-20· cited 13×
• Wolosoff v. Wolosoff
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-09-13· cited 10×