State v. Toevs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence obtained in violation of a statute limiting officers= authority to respond to traffic violations should be suppressed
• holding that continuing requests for consent to search, among other factors, constituted conduct that was significantly beyond that accepted in ordinary social intercourse
• suppressing evidence obtained in violation of ORS 810.410(3)(b) (1993), amended by Oregon Laws 1999, chapter 1051, section 89
• suppressing evidence obtained in violation of ORS 810.410(3)(b) (1993), amended by Oregon Laws 1999, chapter 1051, section 89
• declining to address applicability of that statutory amendment in case where neither party raised the issue
• requiring suppression of evidence where defendant voluntarily consented to search during unlawful seizure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).