Oregon Supreme Court· 12/26/2003

State v. Pine

Citations

82 P.3d 130
336 Or. 194
2003 Ore. LEXIS 949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that “cause” in ORS 163.165(l)(e) reaches a narrower range of conduct than “aid” does
explaining that restraining the victim so that another person could hit him would be so extensively intertwined with the infliction of physical injury that the restraint would be as much a cause of the injury as the blow
reversing conviction where incorrect jury instruction “created an erroneous impression of the law that, if the jury had believed defendant’s version of the facts, would have affected the outcome of the case”
addressing the meaning of “cause” in ORS 163.165, governing third-degree assault
conviction reversed because instructions permitted jury to find defendant guilty even if it failed to find each element of offense
instruction that permitted jury to convict defendant based on facts contrary to statute defining crime substantially affected defendant’s rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Durham, Riggs, De Muniz Balmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Pine

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.