Oregon Supreme Court· 5/11/2006

State v. Cook

Citations

135 P.3d 260
340 Or. 530
2006 Ore. LEXIS 461

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that violations of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause are subject to a harmless error analysis
holding that a trial court’s ruling regarding whether a hearsay statement quali- fies for an exception to the hearsay rule is reviewed for errors of law
declining to abandon this court’s interpretation of Oregon’s Confrontation Clause because federal courts had announced a new analysis of the United States Confrontation Clause
declining to abandon this court's interpretation of Oregon's Confrontation Clause because federal courts had announced a new analysis of the United States Confrontation Clause
explaining that, in Crawford, the United State Supreme Court rejected the Confrontation Clause test that it had announced in Roberts, but that Oregon appellate courts continue to use the Roberts test to analyze confrontation claims under Article I, section 11
explaining that, in Crawford, the United State Supreme Court rejected the Confrontation Clause test that it had announced in Roberts, but that Oregon appellate courts continue to use the Roberts test to analyze confrontation claims under Article I, section 11

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Durham, Riggs, De Muniz Balmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.