Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 5/5/2003

State v. Adams

Citations

  • 580 S.E.2d 785
  • 354 S.C. 361
  • 2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 66

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding arguments not raised to or ruled upon by the trial court are not preserved for appellate review
  • holding arguments not raised to or ruled upon by the trial court are not preserved for appellate review, and a defendant may not argue one ground below and another on appeal
  • holding arguments not raised to and ruled upon by the trial court are not preserved for appellate review, and a defendant may not argue one ground below and another on appeal
  • noting that the Court of Appeals should “review a trial court’s decision regarding Rule 403 pursuant to the abuse of discretion standard and are obligated to give great deference to the trial court’s judgment”
  • stating a trial court's decision regarding the comparative probative value and prejudicial effect of relevant evidence should be reversed only in exceptional circumstances
  • stating “[a]rguments not raised to or ruled upon by the trial court are not preserved for appellate review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Connor, Huff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.