Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 11/29/2004

State v. McLeod

Citations

606 S.E.2d 215
362 S.C. 73
2004 S.C. App. LEXIS 329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that even if the circuit court erred in admitting testimony, the error would be harmless given the overwhelming evidence against the defendant
holding error is harmless where it could not reasonably have affected the result of the trial
finding that even if the trial court erred in admitting testimony, the error would be harmless given the overwhelming evidence against the defendant
stating that under Rule 613(b), extrinsic evidence of the statement is not admissible unless witness is advised of the substance of the statement, the time and place it was allegedly made, and the person to whom it was made
\Error is harmless whe[n] it could not reasonably have affected the result of the trial.\
\A trial [court]'s decision regarding the comparative probative value and prejudicial effect of evidence should be reversed only in exceptional circumstances.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Stilwell, Short

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.