State v. Gaster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this court may reverse the trial court's denial of a directed verdict motion only if there is no evidence to support the trial court's ruling
• holding a constitutional claim must be raised to and ruled upon to be preserved for appellate review
• holding even constitutional issues must be raised to and ruled on by the trial court to be preserved for review
• ruling an appellate court may reverse the trial court's denial of a motion for a directed verdict only \if there is no evidence to support the trial court's ruling\
• finding that on an appeal from trial court’s denial of a motion for a directed verdict, appellate court may only reverse the trial court if there is no evidence to support the trial court’s ruling
• finding disputed evidence was relevant and its probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect such that circuit court properly admitted the evidence within its discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).