Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/19/1998
Carter v. State
Citations
- 495 S.E.2d 773
- 329 S.C. 355
- 1998 S.C. LEXIS 20
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that indictment is captioned “Manufacturing Methamphetamine 44-53-370,” and that “the plain language of the body of the indictment clearly notifies [the defendant] that he is charged with manufacturing methamphetamine”
- illustrating an applicant may challenge the voluntary nature of a guilty plea in a PCR action
- noting a circuit court has subject matter jurisdiction to hear a guilty plea when the crime pled to is a lesser included offense of the crime indicted for
- issues related to subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time, including for the first time on appeal
- where counsel’s advice regarding possible maximum sentence was correct, the Court held that counsel’s performance was not deficient or ineffective
- PCR applicant challenging voluntariness of plea must show that but for counsel's error he would not have pled guilty
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Finney, Toal, Moore, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-05· cited 161×
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-10· cited 75×
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-09-04· cited 72×
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-03-12· cited 71×
- State v. JohnstonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-04· cited 58×
- State v. PassmoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-02-22· cited 47×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-08· cited 44×
- Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-08· cited 34×
- State v. TumblestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-11-27· cited 31×
- Knox v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-04-24· cited 28×
- State v. ScrivenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-03-13· cited 28×
- State v. ElliottSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-09-04· cited 26×
- State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-10-23· cited 26×
- State v. GeigerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-09-25· cited 24×
- United States v. Soterio HopeFourth Circuit· 2022-03-09· cited 24×
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-16· cited 23×
- Locke v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-12· cited 23×
- Joseph v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-10-14· cited 22×
- State v. ErvinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-11-16· cited 22×
- State v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-10-28· cited 22×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- Browning v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-12-11· cited 62×
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-05-08· cited 27×
- Dover v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-06· cited 18×
- Hinson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-03-06· cited 17×
- Murdock v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-04-06· cited 13×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-01· cited 8×
- LoPiano v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-04-17· cited 4×
- Ray v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-02-04· cited 3×
- Crady v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1966-12-01· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.