Skip to main content

Carter v. State

Citations

  • 495 S.E.2d 773
  • 329 S.C. 355
  • 1998 S.C. LEXIS 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that indictment is captioned “Manufacturing Methamphetamine 44-53-370,” and that “the plain language of the body of the indictment clearly notifies [the defendant] that he is charged with manufacturing methamphetamine”
  • illustrating an applicant may challenge the voluntary nature of a guilty plea in a PCR action
  • noting a circuit court has subject matter jurisdiction to hear a guilty plea when the crime pled to is a lesser included offense of the crime indicted for
  • issues related to subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time, including for the first time on appeal
  • where counsel’s advice regarding possible maximum sentence was correct, the Court held that counsel’s performance was not deficient or ineffective
  • PCR applicant challenging voluntariness of plea must show that but for counsel's error he would not have pled guilty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Finney, Toal, Moore, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.