Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 6/11/2014

State v. Gray

Citations

408 S.C. 601
759 S.E.2d 160
2014 WL 2600578
2014 S.C. App. LEXIS 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing this court will not reverse the trial court's decision regarding a Rule 403 objection absent an abuse of discretion and resulting prejudice
explaining \the objective manner in which [the expert] presented the photographs mitigated\ the tendency to suggest a decision on an improper basis
stating \[p]hotos that corroborate important testimony on issues significant to the case may have very high probative value\
upholding the admission of autopsy photos to corroborate State's expert witness and to refute the testimony of defense's expert
stating this court will not reverse the trial court's decision regarding a Rule 403 objection absent an abuse of discretion
illustrating a forensic pathologist, who performed the autopsy, may testify regarding the victim's cause of death based on the forensic pathologist's personal observations of the victim's wounds while performing the autopsy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Few, Geathers, Short

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.