Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 3/19/2007

Jamison v. Ford Motor Co.

Citations

644 S.E.2d 755
373 S.C. 248
2007 S.C. App. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

\The imposition of sanctions is generally entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial court.\
\The [trial] court's decision regarding the imposition of discovery sanctions will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.\
To warrant reversal based on the admission or exclusion of evidence, the complaining party must prove both the error of the ruling and the resulting prejudice.
To warrant reversal based on the admission or exclusion of evidence, the complaining party must prove both the error of the ruling and the resulting prejudice.
\The appellate court will reverse a [circuit] court's decision regarding the grant or denial of a Rule 60(b) motion only if it amounts to an abuse of discretion.\
\The failure to make a proffer of excluded evidence will preclude review on appeal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Kittredge, Short

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Jamison v. Ford Motor Co.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.