Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1/9/2006
State v. Patterson
Citations
- 625 S.E.2d 239
- 367 S.C. 219
- 2006 S.C. App. LEXIS 4
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding fundamental fairness required an entire statement to police to be admitted into evidence pursuant to Rule 106, SCRE, after defense counsel made certain inquiries about the statement, opening the door to its admission
- explaining a \trial court is required to charge only the current and correct law of South Carolina\
- \A jury charge which is substantially correct and covers the law does not require reversal.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Goolsby, Short
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-17· cited 49×
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-03-04· cited 36×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-12-21· cited 33×
- STALK v. RiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-05· cited 32×
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-09-29· cited 32×
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-05-18· cited 27×
- State v. GeigerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-09-25· cited 24×
- State v. Lee-GriggCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-04-16· cited 22×
- State v. RavenellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-03-17· cited 21×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-01-16· cited 21×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-01-16· cited 19×
- City of Aiken v. David Michael KoontzCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-03-20· cited 14×
- State v. HawesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-03-14· cited 14×
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-02-03· cited 13×
- State v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-07-18· cited 11×
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-05-21· cited 9×
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-06-21· cited 7×
- State v. DantonioCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-01-16· cited 7×
- Flexon v. PHC-Jasper, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-03-07· cited 4×
- United States v. MarkertNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2007-07-12· cited 4×
Cites
78 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- Felder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-09-16· cited 557×
- South Carolina v. GathersSupreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 540×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-23· cited 334×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 1978-10-18· cited 209×
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-05· cited 161×
- State v. RuaneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1995-07-14· cited 137×
- State v. SchumpertSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-08-23· cited 136×
- F.P. Corp. v. Twin Modal, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-10-04· cited 116×
- State v. ForresterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-02-12· cited 111×
- State v. ShulerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-16· cited 104×
- People v. FunesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-03-31· cited 104×
- State v. SimsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-24· cited 97×
- State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-12-18· cited 92×
- State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-24· cited 90×
- State v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-01-06· cited 88×
- Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-03-22· cited 84×
- State v. BurkhartSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-06-17· cited 83×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-11-23· cited 71×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-04-06· cited 71×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.