Skip to main content
· 5/6/2010

Spiegel v. Schulmann

Citations

  • 604 F.3d 72
  • 23 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 129
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9274
  • 2010 WL 1791417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the retaliation provision of the ADA . . . cannot provide for individual liability’
  • holding that “the retaliation provision of the ADA . . . cannot provide for individual liability”
  • holding that, “in the context of employment discrimination, the retaliation provision of the ADA .. . cannot provide for individual liability”
  • holding that “the retaliation provision of the ADA . . . cannot provide for individual liability
  • holding that the ADA does not provide for individual liability in the context of employment discrimination
  • holding that discrimination claims under the NYSHRL are subject to the same framework as the related federal claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Livingston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.