Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the disbursement of funds was the first effect of the tort that caused plaintiff’s injury in satisfaction of the “situs-of-injury” test
• holding that the mere allegation of potential lost customers in New York does not support long-arm jurisdiction
• holding that the plaintiff must establish all five elements in order to assert jurisdiction pursuant to section 302(a)(3)(ii)
• holding that the plaintiff must establish all five elements in order to assert jurisdiction pursuant to section 302(a)(3)(ii)
• stating that prima facie showing of jurisdiction can be satisfied with allegations in plaintiffs affidavits and supporting materials
• concluding that there was no jurisdiction when non-domiciliary lawyers provided legal advice to a client in the forum state but \all of the relevant services\ occurred in Puerto Rico and the lawyers never traveled to New York (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).