Papelino v. Albany College of Pharmacy of Union University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on “the context of Title VII” to establish a Title IX retaliation claim and requiring the plaintiff to show “knowledge by the defendant of the protected activity”
• Under the continuing violation doctrine, a plaintiff may bring claims for discriminatory acts that would have been barred by the statute of limitations as long as “an act contributing to that hostile environment [took] place within the statutory time period.”
• applying the doctrine to Title IX

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).