New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reports of settlement prices for oil and gas futures, even though achieved through a creative process, were not copyrightable
• “It is particularly appropriate to decline supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims because they raise issues of fact that are unnecessary to resolve for purposes of deciding the federal claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).