Skip to main content
· 2/17/2005

Dawn Dawson v. Bumble & Bumble

Citations

  • 398 F.3d 211
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2777
  • 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,932
  • 95 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 365
  • 2005 WL 375934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that one can fail to conform to gender stereotypes either through behavior or through appearance
  • stating that McDonnell Douglas analysis applies to NYSHRL and NYCHRL claims
  • stating that an individual may have a viable Title VII discrimination claim where the employer acted out of animus toward his or her “exhibition of behavior considered to be stereotypically inappropriate for their gender”
  • analyzing NYSHRL claims under same analytic framework as Title VII cases
  • dismissing a gender stereotyping claim because the plaintiff \produced no substantial evidence from which [the court could] plausibly infer that her alleged failure to conform her appearance to feminine stereotypes resulted in her suffering any adverse employment action\
  • “Generally speaking, one can fail to conform to gender stereotypes in two ways: (1) through behavior or (2) through appearance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Straub, Pooler, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.