Bermudez v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that NYSHRL and NYCHRL claims were time-barred where allegations fell outside three-year statute of limitations period
• noting that the standard for an adverse employment action under Title VII and § 1981 are the same
• noting that “hostile work environment claims under the NYSHRL are treated the same as claims under federal law”
• observing that the statute of limitations for hostile work environment claims under both NYSHRL is three years
• observing that an alleged adverse employment action was taken “because of” the protected characteristic at issue is “an essential element of an employment discrimination under federal law”
• noting that the NYCHRL was intended to be more protective than its state and federal counterparts, and thus “[t]he standard for maintaining a hostile work environment claim is lower” under the NYCHRL

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).