Skip to main content
· 11/26/1986

Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. Naughton

Citations

  • 806 F.2d 361
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an “agent” for purposes of C.P.L.R. Section 302(a) is a person who has “acted in the state ‘for the benefit of, and with the knowledge and consent of’ the non-resident principal” (citations omitted)
  • finding jurisdictional significance from meetings that were “instrumental” to defendant’s decision to expand business with plaintiff
  • “If the court chooses to rely on pleadings and affidavits, the plaintiff need only make a prima facie showing of [venue]”
  • “If the court chooses to rely on pleadings and affidavits, the plaintiff need only make a prima facie showing of [venue]”
  • it is appropriate to give “some weight” to a choice of law provision
  • sufficient control where agent and principal engaged in joint venture or joint partnership

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaufman, Cardamone, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.