· 11/26/1986
Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. Naughton
Citations
- 806 F.2d 361
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34358
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an “agent” for purposes of C.P.L.R. Section 302(a) is a person who has “acted in the state ‘for the benefit of, and with the knowledge and consent of’ the non-resident principal” (citations omitted)
- finding jurisdictional significance from meetings that were “instrumental” to defendant’s decision to expand business with plaintiff
- “If the court chooses to rely on pleadings and affidavits, the plaintiff need only make a prima facie showing of [venue]”
- “If the court chooses to rely on pleadings and affidavits, the plaintiff need only make a prima facie showing of [venue]”
- it is appropriate to give “some weight” to a choice of law provision
- sufficient control where agent and principal engaged in joint venture or joint partnership
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaufman, Cardamone, Winter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.