· 4/28/1977
George Reiner & Co. v. Schwartz
Citations
- 41 N.Y.2d 648
- 41 N.Y. 648
- 363 N.E.2d 551
- 394 N.Y.S.2d 844
- 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 1936
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding there was jurisdiction over a Massachusetts resident for breach of an employment contract entered into in New York
- noting that “single transaction in New York w[ill] satisfy the statutory requirement”
- finding purposeful availment in breach of contract action where contract demonstrated purposeful creation of a continuing relationship with a New York corporation
- finding jurisdiction on the basis that defendant “was physically present in New York at the time the contract ... was negotiated and made and the contract ... was the transaction out of which the cause of action arose”
- finding jurisdiction on the basis that defendant “was physically present in New York at the time the contract ... was negotiated and made and the contract ... was the transaction out of which the cause of action arose”
- defendant “negotiated and made” the contract in New York and thereby transacted business under the statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cooke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.