Skip to main content
· 4/28/1977

George Reiner & Co. v. Schwartz

Citations

  • 41 N.Y.2d 648
  • 41 N.Y. 648
  • 363 N.E.2d 551
  • 394 N.Y.S.2d 844
  • 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 1936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding there was jurisdiction over a Massachusetts resident for breach of an employment contract entered into in New York
  • noting that “single transaction in New York w[ill] satisfy the statutory requirement”
  • finding purposeful availment in breach of contract action where contract demonstrated purposeful creation of a continuing relationship with a New York corporation
  • finding jurisdiction on the basis that defendant “was physically present in New York at the time the contract ... was negotiated and made and the contract ... was the transaction out of which the cause of action arose”
  • finding jurisdiction on the basis that defendant “was physically present in New York at the time the contract ... was negotiated and made and the contract ... was the transaction out of which the cause of action arose”
  • defendant “negotiated and made” the contract in New York and thereby transacted business under the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cooke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.