Indiana Court of Appeals· 5/23/1989
Snyder v. State
Citations
- 538 N.E.2d 961
- 1989 Ind. App. LEXIS 379
- 1989 WL 56468
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that while a U-turn might give rise to a reasonable suspicion, witnessing a legal turn before a roadblock, standing alone, does not constitute a sufficient articulable fact to warrant an objective, reasonable suspicion
- reasonable suspicion of criminal activity existed where turn, in combination with officer's experience, was made about 300 feet from roadblock
- “a driver’s attempt to avoid [a] roadblock, by making a turn around, *** raise[s] a ‘specific and articulable fact’ which gives rise to a reasonable suspicion on the part of a police officer that the driver may be committing a crime”
- U-turn might give rise to a reasonable suspicion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chezem, Neal, Conover
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Murphy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-09-26· cited 127×
- Ackerman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-09-12· cited 94×
- State v. FriedelIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-08-17· cited 65×
- Hirshey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-08-23· cited 57×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-06-28· cited 49×
- State v. LevittCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2001-12-18· cited 37×
- State v. HeapyHawaii Supreme Court· 2007-01-11· cited 35×
- Melton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-02-16· cited 33×
- Bauder v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2009-10-29· cited 32×
- State v. ThillSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-07-17· cited 27×
- State v. McCleeryNebraska Supreme Court· 1997-03-07· cited 25×
- State v. PowellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1991-05-31· cited 25×
- Pinkney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-01-11· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. MetzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-02-04· cited 23×
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of Missouri· 2002-02-13· cited 22×
- King v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-12-06· cited 22×
- Banks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-06-12· cited 21×
- State v. SkilesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-01-29· cited 21×
- Steinbeck v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1993-10-08· cited 20×
- State v. GiessingerNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-04-20· cited 18×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- People v. ScottNew York Court of Appeals· 1984-11-20· cited 148×
- Little v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-21· cited 125×
- State v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-05-01· cited 101×
- Boches v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1987-04-29· cited 96×
- State v. SmithersIndiana Supreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 65×
- City of Las Cruces v. BetancourtNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-03-05· cited 64×
- Broadus v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-01-20· cited 56×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-09-08· cited 49×
- State v. GarciaIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 45×
- Coffman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1988-11-09· cited 34×
- Sitz v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Court of Appeals· 1988-08-01· cited 21×
- People v. LongAppellate Court of Illinois· 1984-06-14· cited 15×
- Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-09-01· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.