State v. Giessinger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• standing to assert fourth amendment violation premised on person claiming the protection of the amendment having a legitimate expectation of privacy in the invaded place
• regardless of the legality of the roadblock, driver’s actions provided a basis independent of the roadblock which justified his stop
• regardless of the legality of the roadblock, driver's actions provided a basis independent of the roadblock which justified his stop
• motion to strike is not timely where testimony has been adduced without objection and where grounds for motion should have been apparent at time of testimony
• wherein court recognized in factual section of its opinion that conservation officer, participating in roadblock with State Patrol officers, has “statewide authority to enforce traffic laws as well as game, fish, and park regulations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).