New York Court of Appeals· 11/20/1984
People v. Scott
Citations
- 63 N.Y.2d 518
- 473 N.E.2d 1
- 483 N.Y.S.2d 649
- 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4715
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in the case of a fixed checkpoint, “the known and permanent location of the checkpoint [makes] it easily avoidable.”
- \There is ... no question that a roadblock or checkpoint is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.\
- \There is ... no question that a roadblock or checkpoint is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.\
- \it is publicity about roadblocks that is the chief means of deterring driving while intoxicated\
- written operating procedures which allowed police officers from a roadblock to follow drivers avoiding the roadblock to observe for traffic violations, thus implying that the act of making a U-turn, standing alone, would not be enough to constitute a reasonable suspicion
- DUI roadblock prevails in balancing test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
117 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DowneyTennessee Supreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 198×
- Commonwealth v. TarbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-29· cited 165×
- People v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals· 1995-01-17· cited 150×
- City of Seattle v. MesianiWashington Supreme Court· 1988-05-12· cited 144×
- Murphy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-09-26· cited 127×
- Ingersoll v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1987-10-29· cited 127×
- Brown v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1985-11-27· cited 121×
- Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1987-09-15· cited 119×
- People v. WeaverNew York Court of Appeals· 2009-05-12· cited 114×
- Patchogue-Medford Congress of Teachers v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals· 1987-06-09· cited 87×
- People v. BartleyIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-11-21· cited 83×
- People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-12-23· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. TrumbleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-10-15· cited 82×
- State v. HendersonIdaho Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 76×
- State v. KirkNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-05-28· cited 66×
- Matter of Muhammad F.New York Court of Appeals· 1999-11-30· cited 65×
- State v. KoppelSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-08-16· cited 65×
- City of Las Cruces v. BetancourtNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-03-05· cited 64×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-04-30· cited 58×
- Snyder v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-05-23· cited 56×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 1,275×
- United States v. KnottsSupreme Court· 1983-03-02· cited 749×
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 746×
- People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals· 1975-04-01· cited 541×
- United States v. Villamonte-MarquezSupreme Court· 1983-06-17· cited 415×
- People v. BeltonNew York Court of Appeals· 1982-02-11· cited 293×
- People v. John BB.New York Court of Appeals· 1982-07-02· cited 68×
- State v. HilleshiemSupreme Court of Iowa· 1980-04-23· cited 67×
- State v. OlgaardSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1976-12-31· cited 52×
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals· 1984-10-16· cited 32×
- People v. PeilWappinger Justice Court· 1984-01-24· cited 17×
- Estrada v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-11-26· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.