Skip to main content
· 8/23/2006

Hirshey v. State

Citations

  • 852 N.E.2d 1008
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 1676
  • 2006 WL 2423083

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming conviction for possession of methamphetaime with intent to deliver solely upon evidence that defendant possessed 9.56 grams of the drug, which was broken down into individual packages and was an amount inconsistent with personal usage
  • in case where statements made in violation of Miranda led to discovery of physical evidence, concluding that Miranda violation did not require suppression of physical evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crone, Kirsch, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.