Skip to main content

Banks v. State

Citations

  • 681 N.E.2d 235
  • 1997 Ind. App. LEXIS 743
  • 1997 WL 312482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he inevitable discovery exception to the rule permits the introduction of evidence that eventually would have been located had there been no error, for [in] that instance ‘there is no nexus sufficient to provide a taint.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chezem, Sharpnack, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.