Court of Appeals of Maryland· 8/21/1984
Little v. State
Citations
- 479 A.2d 903
- 300 Md. 485
- 1984 Md. LEXIS 339
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that brief stop at sobriety checkpoint was not “arrest”
- noting that the Fourth Amendment only prohibits seizures that are unreasonable
- \operation of the checkpoints is suspended if traffic becomes congested\ and \[t]he stops themselves last less than half a minute\
- sobriety checkpoint seizure held to be constitutional, despite lack of warrant, in light of the “State’s compelling interest in detecting and deterring drunk driving”
- “The magnitude of the problem created by intoxicated motorists cannot be exaggerated.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky, Couch, Morton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- DiPino v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-05-11· cited 240×
- State v. DowneyTennessee Supreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 198×
- Commonwealth v. TarbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-29· cited 165×
- Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-06-08· cited 157×
- Ingersoll v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1987-10-29· cited 127×
- Trusty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-03-04· cited 124×
- Brown v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1985-11-27· cited 121×
- Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1987-09-15· cited 119×
- Wilkes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-06-25· cited 104×
- Potts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-22· cited 91×
- People v. BartleyIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-11-21· cited 83×
- People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-12-23· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. TrumbleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-10-15· cited 82×
- In Re Tariq A-R-YCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-10-21· cited 81×
- State v. HendersonIdaho Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 76×
- Gadson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-12-07· cited 70×
- Pueblo v. Yip BerríosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1997-01-30· cited 68×
- State v. KirkNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-05-28· cited 66×
- State v. KoppelSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-08-16· cited 65×
- City of Las Cruces v. BetancourtNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-03-05· cited 64×
Cites
60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 1,282×
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 1,275×
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court· 1971-06-01· cited 1,006×
- Tate v. ShortSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 837×
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court· 1957-02-25· cited 760×
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 746×
- United States v. OrtizSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 581×
- United States v. Villamonte-MarquezSupreme Court· 1983-06-17· cited 415×
- State v. DeskinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1983-12-02· cited 149×
- State v. TourtillotOregon Supreme Court· 1980-10-21· cited 121×
- State v. TourtillottOregon Supreme Court· 1980-10-21· cited 114×
- State v. SwiftSupreme Court of Georgia· 1974-06-25· cited 97×
- Department of Transportation v. ArmacostCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-05-01· cited 96×
- Commonwealth v. McGeogheganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-05-11· cited 92×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.