State v. McCleery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the police officers did not have a reasonable suspicion to stop the defendant’s car- solely because she appeared to be evading an intoxication checkpoint in light of Nebraska’s adherence to the Guide
• concluding that the police officers did not have a reasonable suspicion to stop the defendant’s car solely because she appeared to be evading an intoxication checkpoint in light of Nebraska’s adherence to “The Use of Sobriety Checkpoints for Impaired Driving Enforcement,” (Nov.1990
• holding approaching motorist who turns around and 17 drives away rather than pass through a checkpoint does not trigger reasonable suspicion for a stop
• holding approaching motorist who turns around and drives away rather than pass through a checkpoint does not trigger reasonable suspicion for a stop
• holding approaching motorist who turns around and 17 drives away rather than pass through a checkpoint does not trigger reasonable suspicion for a stop
• stopping one’s vehicle before sobriety checkpoint and backing away does not give rise to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity where checkpoint conducted in compliance with operational directive that avoidance of checkpoint not grounds for stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).