Skip to main content
· 8/17/1999

State v. Friedel

Citations

  • 714 N.E.2d 1231
  • 1999 Ind. App. LEXIS 1393
  • 1999 WL 619378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant had standing to challenge search of her purse even if she did not have standing to challenge search of van in which purse was found
  • holding that defendant had standing to challenge search of her purse even if she did not have standing to challenge search of van in which purse was found
  • holding a driver’s consent to the search of an automobile did not include consent to search the passenger’s purse, which was left in the vehicle
  • holding State waived claim when it 6 failed to raise it to the trial court
  • holding State \failed to preserve any argument it might have under the Indiana Constitution\
  • holding party “failed to preserve any argument it might have under the Indiana Constitution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Sullivan, Mattingly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.