Skip to main content

Sexton v. State

Citations

  • 775 So. 2d 923
  • 2000 WL 1508567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that collateral bad acts testimony regarding the mysterious death and subsequent burial of the defendant’s infant grandchild was admissible because: (1) it was relevant to explain the defendant’s motive for killing his son-in-law (the father of the dead baby
  • holding abuse of discretion standard applicable in determining if trial court afforded proper weight to aggravating factor
  • “The failure to contemporaneously object to a comment on the basis that it constitutes improper victim testimony renders the claim procedurally barred absent fundamental error.”
  • \[I]t is this Court's independent obligation to review the record for sufficiency of evidence.\
  • “This Court has consistently found a Nelson hearing unwarranted where a defendant presents general complaints about defense counsel’s trial strategy and no formal allegations of incompetence have been made. See Davis v. State, 703 So.2d 1055, 1058-59 (Fla. 1997

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.