Pearce v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that to establish CCP, the State must prove each element of CCP beyond a reasonable doubt
• explaining that impeachment material under section 90.608(1) does not - 56 - have to “directly contradict” the witness’s testimony as long as it is “materially different” from it
• explaining that defense counsel laid the proper foundation under section 90.614(2
• rejecting the defendant’s Enmund/Tison argument because the defendant’s role in the murder was “explained in detail in the sentencing order” and was “supported by the evidence”
• rejecting the defendant's Enmund / Tison argument because the defendant's role in the murder was \explained in detail in the sentencing order\ and was \supported by the evidence\
• ‘“Nit-picking’ is not permitted under the guise of prior inconsistent statements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).