Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 859 So. 2d 465
  • 2003 WL 22097428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the post-warning statements were admissible where the initial discussion was only ten minutes
  • holding that the postwarning statements were admissible where the initial discussion was only ten minutes
  • noting that under Elstad, \a careful and thorough administration of Miranda warnings serves to cure the condition that made an unwarned statement inadmissible\
  • finding death sentence recommended by a vote of seven to five by jury proportional where three aggravators, including crime committed while on felony probation, HAC, and CCP, outweighed one statutory mitigator given slight weight and four nonstatutory mitigators given some weight
  • “This Court has repeatedly rejected Davis’s argument and held that a capital jury may recommend a death sentence by a majority vote.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.