Skip to main content

Larkins v. State

Citations

  • 739 So. 2d 90
  • 1999 WL 506968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an invalid finding of the HAC aggravating circumstance was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of the remaining valid aggravating circumstances
  • noting that HAC and CCP are \two of the most serious aggravators set out in the statutory sentencing scheme\
  • stating that a defendant's sentence is controlled by the law in effect at the time he committed the offense
  • observing that the appellant’s “sentence is controlled by the law in effect at the time he committed this offense”
  • finding two weak aggravators were outweighed by thirteen significant mitigating circumstances
  • \[HAC and CCP] are two of the most serious aggravators set out in the statutory sentencing scheme....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Larkins v. State

17 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.