Skip to main content

Reed v. State

Citations

  • 793 N.W.2d 725
  • 2010 Minn. LEXIS 803
  • 2010 WL 5348083

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a criminal statute of limitations was “a claim-processing rule, and not a jurisdictional rule”
  • concluding that because the petitioner’s ineffective-assistance- of-appellate-counsel claim is partially based on appellate counsel’s failure to raise another claim on direct appeal, the merits of both claims must be addressed
  • “Because a subject-matter-jurisdiction claim involves a court’s power to hear a case, the claim can never be forfeited or waived.” (quotation omitted)
  • “[F]or statute-of-limitations purposes, a charge of aiding and abetting first-degree murder is indistinguishable from a charge of first-degree murder”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Barry, Consideration, Stras, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.