Skip to main content

Erickson v. State

Citations

  • 842 N.W.2d 314
  • 2014 WL 463206
  • 2014 Minn. LEXIS 57

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the petitioner’s pro se status and limited educational attainment did not prevent him from filing in a timely manner
  • stating that, “absent an applicable statutory exception, the time bar precludes all of [petitioner]’s claims,” including his ineffective-assistance claim
  • “Absent a compelling reason, we will not reconsider a claim that we have previously rejected in the same case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.