Chaun Dubae Carridine v. State of Minnesota

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that failure to file motion to suppress evidence was related to unreviewable trial strategy
• stating that “[petitioner’s] claims of prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of trial counsel could have been raised on direct appeal because the claims are based on the trial record”
• discussing unreviewable nature of trial strategy in context of claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel
• refusing to strike a pro se appellant’s amended brief because, among other reasons, the respondent filed a response to the amended brief
• applying the clearly erroneous standard to the posteonviction court’s credibility findings
• “When a petitioner bases his ineffective-assistance-of- appellate-counsel claim on appellate counsel’s failure to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, he must first show that trial counsel was ineffective.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).