Supreme Court of Minnesota· 8/10/2011
Johnson v. State
Citations
- 801 N.W.2d 173
- 2011 Minn. LEXIS 465
- 2011 WL 3477054
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plain language of the rule does not allow a defendant to challenge his conviction
- concluding that offender’s claim was not proper under rule 27.03, subdivision 9, and reviewing as petition for postconviction relief
- concluding that the “plain language” of rule 27.03, subdivision 9, “does not allow a defendant to challenge his conviction”
- stating that “the plain language of [rule 27.03, subdivision 9,] does not allow a defendant to challenge his conviction”
- noting that a challenge to a conviction may not be brought under rule 27.03, subdivision 9, which is limited to sentencing issues
- stating that because the defendant had not argued that a petition for postconviction relief would be inadequate or ineffective, his exclusive remedy was a petition for postconviction relief, not a Rule 27.03 motion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lussier v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-10-10· cited 73×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-04-07· cited 30×
- State of Minnesota v. Dakari Michael ColesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-04-15· cited 26×
- Harry Jerome Evans v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-06-08· cited 24×
- Vazquez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-10-29· cited 23×
- State v. AmundsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-04-15· cited 18×
- State of Minnesota v. Toby Earl JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-07-30· cited 13×
- Michael Wayne v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-10-14· cited 13×
- Orozco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-01-06· cited 6×
- Toby Earl Johnson v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-04-13· cited 5×
- Rossberg v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-07-31· cited 1×
- State v. MulcahyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-06-11
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-06-25· cited 418×
- State v. RourkeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-10-22· cited 59×
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-12-29· cited 58×
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-04-21· cited 49×
- Ortiz Ex Rel. Ortiz v. GavendaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-18· cited 37×
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-01-10· cited 31×
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-08-01· cited 29×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-04-18· cited 19×
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-04-16· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.