Seventh Circuit· 1/7/1928
Larrison v. United States
Citations
- 24 F.2d 82
- 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 1964
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “That the party seeking the new trial was taken by surprise when the false testimony was given and was unable to meet it or did not know of its falsity until after the trial.”
- “That the party seeking the new trial was taken by surprise when the false testimony was given and was unable to meet it or did not know of its falsity until after the trial ”
- whether the jury “might have reached a different conclusion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Evans, Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
267 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MixonTennessee Supreme Court· 1999-01-19· cited 644×
- United States v. Efraim Natanel A/K/A Efriam NatanelFirst Circuit· 1991-07-09· cited 374×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1946-03-04· cited 361×
- Farrar v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2009-05-26· cited 194×
- United States v. George StofskySecond Circuit· 1975-11-07· cited 170×
- United States v. Nicholas J. Mangieri, Jr.D.C. Circuit· 1982-11-23· cited 169×
- Walter Sanders v. James E. Sullivan and Robert Abrams, the Attorney General of the State of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1988-12-02· cited 162×
- United States v. Milton SilvermanSecond Circuit· 1970-07-01· cited 160×
- United States v. Steven C. Griffin, Marvin M. Rux, and Andrae ScurlockSeventh Circuit· 1996-07-30· cited 157×
- United States v. Frank CostelloSecond Circuit· 1958-05-20· cited 150×
- United States v. Henry James Wright, Jr.First Circuit· 1980-03-27· cited 143×
- State v. McCallumWisconsin Supreme Court· 1997-04-18· cited 143×
- United States v. Kevin O. Depriest and Steve MorrellSeventh Circuit· 1993-09-21· cited 141×
- State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court· 1989-07-10· cited 131×
- United States v. SinclairTenth Circuit· 1997-03-26· cited 130×
- Opsahl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-04-08· cited 130×
- United States v. James MillerSecond Circuit· 1969-03-14· cited 127×
- United States v. Roberto Gonzalez, Roberto Ramirez, Angel M. Amejeiras, Vicente Chao, Luis Gonzalez, and Rafael IzquierdoSeventh Circuit· 1991-05-02· cited 123×
- United States v. Cyrus T. AndersonD.C. Circuit· 1975-03-24· cited 122×
- State v. ScrogginsIdaho Supreme Court· 1986-04-29· cited 113×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.